Legal status of bloggers debated / Journalists’ shield claimed in response to Apple’s lawsuit

It’s a tough call…for every Ted Roche, who provides links to valuable information, there’s a Madge or a ______ ( put your own name in here)….who is simply providing their own ….

Stop – even Ted provides his own commentary on his posts…if I go to a journalism school, does that make me any better?

I don’t think so – yes, journalists should be more vigilant but many times, columnists are considered to be the same as journalists- are they really? If columnists are allowed to be protected, then so should bloggers.

Because what is a blog? – it is a column by someone who gives a damn.

Legal status of bloggers debated / Journalists’ shield claimed in response to Apple’s lawsuit

2 thoughts on “Legal status of bloggers debated / Journalists’ shield claimed in response to Apple’s lawsuit”

  1. I’m not sure what the law i in Canada, but the U.S. system is a mess (surprised?). The U.S. Consititutions;’s Bill of Rights provides for “freedom of the press” in Amendment 1:

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html

    The tradition that journalists have a right to protect their sources to whom they have given a promise of confidentiality is not a Constitutional Right, but it is one that is granted by state “shield laws” in some but not all states. While the confidentiality provisions of client-attorney or doctor-patient privileges can be tested by the standard that the attorney or doctor is licensed to practice their professsion, there is no professsional licensing of journalists and so I think the question of where to draw the line is more difficult.

    More on my blog… http://radio.weblogs.com/0117767

    Reply
  2. Likely a mess in most places – I think clouding the waters is the thought that a device was stolen to get the news. Theft is wrong (even for journalists!) – if this is true, then they certainly shouldn’t be protected.

    Have you posted more on your blog? I only found the Dan Gilmor stuff.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact

48 Stonemeadow Drive
Kanata, Ontario K2M2K2

+1 613-851-4496 Contact Us

Connect

Newsletter

Coming Soon